What do you do when your country is attacked and left with deep scars that are still healing?
1999 - It was the first time that NATO used military force without the approval of the UN Security Council and was against a sovereign nation that posed no real threat to any member of the alliance - which makes me wonder about the legitimacy of this attack.
The illegal bombing destroyed and damaged houses, roads, bridges, etc. Many public buildings were damaged, including airports, hospitals, kindergartens, schools and cultural monuments. Not to mention the thousands of deaths, unnecessary deaths! All of this destruction was unnecessary. There was a clear violation of international law !!! In 1999, the year of the attack, Kosovo was still a part of Yugoslavia and therefore the NATO campaign that was mainly supported by the US was illegitimate! The bombing had nothing to do with the protection of albanians from Kosovo, which even today are more and more becoming puppets of the United States. They decided to bomb because Serbia wasn't subordinated to US neoliberal programs, and because it wasn't carrying out social and economic reforms that Americans much wanted. The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) was a "paramilitary organization" of ethnic Albanians who sought the separation of Kosovo from Yugoslavia. And in 1998 they were considered a terrorist organization by the US, but impressively in 1999 (when NATO decided to attack Serbia) they went from being terrorists to be financed by the CIA ... - 78 Days of continuous bombing, where supposedly three days would be sufficient by US accounts ... The fact that there was violence on both sides of the confrontation (both by Kosovar Albanians and Serbs) was ignored by both government allies and by the Western media - which aroused public anger, focusing only on the atrocities caused by the Serbs and it was much less vocal about the abuse by Albanians. No one should seriously promote the killing of civilians to protect the human rights of other civilians. Ordinary citizens are the biggest victims, cynically called "collateral damage !! With this I would like to remember the insolent attitude in relation to human victims, shown by the leaders of the bombings of NATO - from Madeleine Albright to Bill Clinton, and I have nothing else to say!!
1999 - It was the first time that NATO used military force without the approval of the UN Security Council and was against a sovereign nation that posed no real threat to any member of the alliance - which makes me wonder about the legitimacy of this attack.
The illegal bombing destroyed and damaged houses, roads, bridges, etc. Many public buildings were damaged, including airports, hospitals, kindergartens, schools and cultural monuments. Not to mention the thousands of deaths, unnecessary deaths! All of this destruction was unnecessary. There was a clear violation of international law !!! In 1999, the year of the attack, Kosovo was still a part of Yugoslavia and therefore the NATO campaign that was mainly supported by the US was illegitimate! The bombing had nothing to do with the protection of albanians from Kosovo, which even today are more and more becoming puppets of the United States. They decided to bomb because Serbia wasn't subordinated to US neoliberal programs, and because it wasn't carrying out social and economic reforms that Americans much wanted. The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) was a "paramilitary organization" of ethnic Albanians who sought the separation of Kosovo from Yugoslavia. And in 1998 they were considered a terrorist organization by the US, but impressively in 1999 (when NATO decided to attack Serbia) they went from being terrorists to be financed by the CIA ... - 78 Days of continuous bombing, where supposedly three days would be sufficient by US accounts ... The fact that there was violence on both sides of the confrontation (both by Kosovar Albanians and Serbs) was ignored by both government allies and by the Western media - which aroused public anger, focusing only on the atrocities caused by the Serbs and it was much less vocal about the abuse by Albanians. No one should seriously promote the killing of civilians to protect the human rights of other civilians. Ordinary citizens are the biggest victims, cynically called "collateral damage !! With this I would like to remember the insolent attitude in relation to human victims, shown by the leaders of the bombings of NATO - from Madeleine Albright to Bill Clinton, and I have nothing else to say!!
0 comments:
Post a Comment